Young v Autumn View Investments
Tenant wins · York · 2025-10-09
- Adjudicator
- Richard Ferriss
- Dispute
- Harassment, Maintenance, Substantial Interference
- Landlord
- Autumn View Investments
- Tenant
- J.Y., H.A.
- Landlord rep
- John Vella
What happened
The Landlord requested a review of an order issued on September 4, 2025, which found that the Landlord had substantially interfered with the Tenants' reasonable enjoyment, harassed them, and failed to meet maintenance obligations. The Landlord argued that the damages awarded were excessive and that there was a serious error regarding the Tenants' entitlement to a parking spot. The Board found that the Landlord was largely re-arguing its original case and that the parking spot determination was supported by a statutory declaration from the Landlord's own agent.
The ruling
The Landlord's request for a review of the order dated September 4, 2025, is denied. The original order, which favored the Tenants regarding maintenance and harassment claims, is confirmed and remains unchanged.