Tang v Smith
Landlord wins · Windsor · 2025-01-08
- Adjudicator
- Panagiotis Peter Roupas
- Dispute
- Damage to Property, Substantial Interference
- Notice
- N5 Notice to End your Tenancy for interfering with others, damage or overcrowding
- Amount
- $5-10K
- Landlord
- Y.T.
- Tenant
- L.V.S., F.B.R.
- Landlord rep
- Cameron Parrott
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant, and willful or negligent damage to the premises. The Landlord served a valid N5 notice, but the Tenants had already vacated the rental unit prior to the hearing.
The ruling
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy is dismissed as the Tenants had already vacated the rental unit. However, the Tenants are ordered to pay the Landlord $8,955.00 for the reasonable costs to repair and replace property damaged by the Tenants, as well as $186.00 for the application filing costs, for a total of $9,141.00 to be paid by January 19, 2025. If the Tenants do not pay the full amount by the due date, they will owe interest at 5% annually on the outstanding balance.