Evictly

Skyline Real Estate Holdings Inc. v Mooney

Tenant wins · Cambridge · 2025-10-08

Adjudicator
Amanda Kovats
Dispute
Non-payment of Rent, Rent Increase Dispute
Landlord
Skyline Real Estate Holdings Inc., C/O Skyline Living
Tenant
T.M.

What happened

The Landlord applied for a review of a previous order which found a rent increase to be void because no notice of rent increase was served. The Landlord argued that Section 136 of the Residential Tenancies Act should deem the rent increase lawful since it had been charged for over a year. The Board conducted a preliminary review to determine if a serious error had occurred in the original decision.

The ruling

The request to review the order issued on September 29, 2025, is denied. The original order, which determined the rent increase was void due to lack of notice, remains unchanged and confirmed.