Sivaraj v Macwana
Landlord wins · Scarborough · 2025-11-21
- Adjudicator
- Amanda Kovats
- Dispute
- Personal Use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Landlord
- B.S.
- Tenant
- N.M.
What happened
The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy because a purchaser required the unit for personal occupation. An initial order granted the eviction. The Tenant filed for a review, claiming that new evidence from a real estate website indicated the sale had fallen through shortly after the hearing. The review was considered without a full hearing.
The ruling
The request to review the order issued on November 7, 2025, is denied. The original order, which terminated the tenancy for the purchaser's personal use, remains confirmed and unchanged. The Board ruled that the Tenant's evidence regarding the sale falling through after the hearing was inadmissible for a review.