Evictly

Singh v Taku

Landlord wins · Brampton · 2025-12-08

Adjudicator
Amanda Kovats
Dispute
Harassment, Non-payment of Rent
Notice
Non-payment of rent (N4)
Landlord
J.S., B.T.S.
Tenant
B.T.

What happened

The Tenant requested a review of a previous order requiring the payment of rent arrears. The Tenant claimed she was unable to participate effectively in the original hearing due to emotional distress caused by the Landlord's harassment. Additionally, the Tenant argued that the Board failed to consider issues related to a written lease and section 82 claims. The adjudicator found that the Tenant did participate in the hearing and failed to raise these issues at that time.

The ruling

The Tenant's request for a review of the order dated November 12, 2025, is denied. The original order, which requires the Tenant to pay rent arrears, remains in full force. The Board found no merit in the Tenant's claims of inability to participate or procedural errors.