Sharma v Harrington-mckenna

Tenant wins · Oakville · 2024-10-16

Adjudicator

Sheena Brar

Dispute

Damage to Property, Substantial Interference

Notice

N5

Amount

$10-20K

Landlord

R.K.S., M.R.S., D.K.S.

Tenant

T.H.

Landlord rep

Y. Van maurik

What happened

Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlords or another tenant, and wilful or negligent damage to the premises. The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date.

The ruling

The Landlords' application is dismissed. The Landlords did not provide sufficient proof of the damage claimed, and the Tenant was not required to pay the utility bills under the terms of the tenancy agreement.