Sardi v Boyd

Split/Other wins · Orangeville · 2024-06-06

Adjudicator

Brett Lockwood

Dispute

Damage to Property, Substantial Interference

Notice

N5

Amount

<$5K

Landlord

M.S.

Tenant

J.B.

Landlord rep

Amol Bhangoo

What happened

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex and for damages caused by the Tenant. The Landlord served a valid N5 notice, but the Tenant did not void the notice during the remedial period.

The ruling

The Landlord proved the Tenant substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex by monopolizing the shed and locking the backyard gate, and by failing to provide proof of insurance as required by the lease. However, the Tenant will be given an opportunity to correct this conduct and avoid eviction. The Tenant must comply with the conditions set out in the order, including ensuring the shed is shared, removing the lock on the backyard gate, and providing proof of insurance.