Rojas v Cordero
Landlord wins · Brampton · 2024-09-27
- Adjudicator
- Greg Witt
- Dispute
- Personal Use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Landlord
- L.R., D.R.
- Tenant
- P.C., P.C.
- Landlord rep
- Teri Landriault
- Tenant rep
- Yasmin Van Maurik
What happened
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because the Landlords in good faith require possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for at least one year by the Landlord's son, Mr. Eccles.
The ruling
The Landlord has proven the grounds for termination of the tenancy under section 48 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 for the purpose of residential occupation by the Landlord's son for at least one year. The tenancy is terminated as of October 31, 2024. The Landlord is ordered to compensate the Tenant $2,750 by re-issuing an e-transfer by October 31, 2024. The Tenant is ordered to pay the Landlord $90.14 per day for use of the unit starting November 1, 2024 until the Tenant moves out.