Omojola v Hey

Landlord wins · Mississauga · 2025-12-12

Adjudicator

Harry Cho

Dispute

Breach of Conditions, Harassment, Substantial Interference, Tenant Rights

Landlord

L.A.H., R.H.

Tenant

A.O.

Tenant rep

Mother

What happened

The Tenant filed a request for review of an order dated October 27, 2025, which dismissed their application regarding illegal entry, lock changes, substantial interference, and harassment. The Tenant claimed they were unable to participate in the original hearing because they were attending school. However, the Board found that the Tenant's mother acted as an authorized agent, introduced evidence, and cross-examined the Landlords. The Board also upheld the finding that the tenancy had ended by agreement in June 2025.

The ruling

The Tenant's request for a review of the order issued on October 27, 2025, is denied. The original order, which dismissed the Tenant's claims against the Landlords, remains unchanged and confirmed. The Board concluded that the Tenant participated sufficiently through an agent and failed to demonstrate any serious error in the previous proceeding.