Minto Multi-Res Income 1, LP v Picard

Landlord wins · Nepean · 2025-07-10

Adjudicator

James Campbell

Dispute

Substantial Interference

Notice

Substantial interference (N5)

Amount

<$5K

Landlord

Minto Multi-Res Income 1 LP

Tenant

S.P.

Landlord rep

Anne Skelly

What happened

The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex. The Tenant received a first N5 notice for screaming at unit doors, which was voided. A second, non-voidable N5 was issued after the Tenant admitted to leaving a bathtub running, causing a flood that damaged unit flooring and common areas.

The ruling

The LTB ordered the termination of the tenancy effective July 21, 2025, due to substantial interference (flooding and previous screaming). The Tenant is ordered to pay $4,209.12 to the Landlord, which accounts for daily compensation and filing fees, minus the rent deposit and interest. If the Tenant does not vacate by the specified date, the Sheriff is directed to enforce the eviction.