Evictly

Martins v Macleod

Landlord wins · Toronto · 2025-09-12

Adjudicator
Camille Tancioco
Dispute
Substantial Interference
Landlord
D.M., M.M.
Tenant
S.M.
Landlord rep
Catharine Salgado

What happened

The Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy because the Tenant substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment. An order for eviction was issued on August 1, 2025. A roommate of the Tenant (Occupant 1) requested a review of the order, alleging serious errors including a failure to add the roommate as a party, failure to accommodate a disability, and procedural errors regarding evidence.

The ruling

The request to review order LTB-L-061939-23 is denied. The original order issued on August 1, 2025, which terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction due to substantial interference, remains confirmed and unchanged. The Board found no serious error in the previous member's decision to exclude a roommate as a party or to deny an adjournment request.