Evictly

Malla v Akash

Tenant wins · Etobicoke · 2025-10-15

Adjudicator
Fabio Quattrociocchi
Dispute
Personal Use, Review Order
Notice
Personal use (N12)
Amount
$5-10K
Landlord
H.S.M., S.S.
Tenant
A.A., J.D.

What happened

Landlords applied to terminate the tenancy for personal use. The application was discontinued because the Landlords failed to pay a $5,000.00 administrative fine previously ordered by the Board in a separate matter. The Landlords requested a review of the discontinuation order, claiming the fine-imposing order was pending review. The LTB found that the request to review the fine-imposing order had already been denied, meaning the fine was due and unpaid.

The ruling

The Landlords' request to review the discontinuation of their eviction application is denied. The original order stands, effectively stopping the Landlords' attempt to terminate the tenancy for personal use because they have an outstanding $5,000.00 administrative fine owed to the Landlord and Tenant Board.