Evictly

Khatri v Clarke

Landlord wins · Tottenham · 2025-09-03

Adjudicator
Dana Wren
Dispute
Non-payment of Rent, Substantial Interference, Utility Costs
Notice
Non-payment of rent (N4), Substantial interference (N5)
Amount
<$5K
Landlord
U.V.K., V.A.P.
Tenant
I.C., A.C.
Landlord rep
Mehria Qarizadha
Tenant rep
Chief Michael

What happened

The Landlords originally applied for eviction based on non-payment of rent, substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment, and unpaid utility costs. An order was issued on July 9, 2025. The Tenants filed for a review of this order. During the review hearing, the Tenants attempted to have an unidentified individual ('Chief Michael') represent them. This individual refused to provide his full name and behaved aggressively, leading to his exclusion. The Tenants refused to proceed without him, resulting in the dismissal of their review request.

The ruling

The Tenants' request to review the previous eviction order was denied because they refused to proceed with the hearing after their unidentified and aggressive representative was excluded. The original order issued on July 9, 2025, remains in effect and the stay is lifted. The Tenants are ordered to pay the Landlords $100.00 in costs for unreasonable conduct during the proceedings.