Guo v Ruetter
Tenant wins · Oakville · 2025-10-09
- Adjudicator
- Robert Patchett
- Dispute
- Personal Use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Landlord
- L.G., N.L.
- Tenant
- D.R.
- Landlord rep
- Desislava Yordanova
- Tenant rep
- Bryan Liu
What happened
The Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy for personal use, claiming the unit was required for the residential occupation of Landlord 1's brother. The application was ultimately dismissed because a brother is not defined as an immediate family member under the Residential Tenancies Act for personal use evictions, and Landlord 1 provided contradictory testimony due to a significant language barrier.
The ruling
The Landlords' application to terminate the tenancy for personal use is dismissed. The adjudicator found that a sibling does not qualify as an immediate family member under the Act. Furthermore, the Landlord 1's testimony was found to be contradictory and they demonstrated a lack of understanding regarding the legal declaration they had signed.