Flynn v Kwak

Landlord wins · Toronto · 2025-11-12

Adjudicator

Harry Cho

Dispute

Harassment, Interference With Vital Services, Maintenance, Tenant Rights

Notice

Maintenance (T6), Tenant rights (T2)

Amount

$5-10K

Landlord

B.K., M.S.C.

Tenant

S.F., J.G.

What happened

Tenant 1 requested a review of a consent order that settled a dispute involving maintenance, harassment, and vital services. Tenant 1 claimed they were unable to participate in the hearing and that there was an error in the order. The Board found that the co-tenant (Tenant 2) had authority to negotiate the settlement and that Tenant 1 was properly served with notice via email.

The ruling

The request to review the consent order is denied. The original order issued on October 28, 2025, which mandated the Landlords to pay the Tenants $7,500.00, is confirmed. The Board found that Tenant 2 acted with authority on behalf of both joint tenants and that Tenant 1 received proper notice of the hearing.