Evictly

Edwards v Macdonald

Split/Other wins · Guelph · 2025-09-10

Adjudicator
Mayra Sawicki
Dispute
Harassment, Substantial Interference, Tenant Rights
Notice
Tenant rights (T2)
Landlord
A.M.
Tenant
N.E., T.E.
Landlord rep
B. Beaudoin

What happened

Tenants filed an application alleging the Landlord entered the unit illegally, harassed them, and interfered with their reasonable enjoyment. The allegations included constant walkthroughs, emails, and unauthorized photos. At the hearing, the Landlord's representative argued the application lacked sufficient particulars. The Tenants attempted to amend the application very late (over two years after filing), which the Board denied. Following this denial and the finding that the original application lacked detail, the Tenants chose to withdraw their application.

The ruling

The Tenants' application was withdrawn during the hearing. The LTB file is closed. The Board previously denied the Tenants' request to amend their application due to lack of particulars and procedural delays.