Edoria v RICHLAND TECH INC

Landlord wins · Orangeville · 2025-10-22

Adjudicator

Melissa Anjema

Dispute

Maintenance, Substantial Interference

Landlord

RICHLAND TECH INC

Tenant

M.E.E.

Landlord rep

David Borrie

Tenant rep

Charity Dela Cruz

What happened

The Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord failed to meet maintenance obligations or comply with health and safety standards (T6 application). The core of the Tenant's complaint was that the Landlord reallocated their assigned parking spots to undesirable locations. The Landlord argued that this issue was not a maintenance matter but rather an issue of substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment.

The ruling

The Tenant's application is dismissed. The Board determined that the issue regarding the reallocation of parking spots was misfiled as a maintenance application (T6) when it should have been filed as an interference application (T2). The Tenant's legal representative did not seek to amend the application before the hearing.