Dennison v Sterling Karamar Property Management
Landlord wins · Toronto · 2024-10-03
- Adjudicator
- Rachel Gibbons
- Dispute
- Alteration Of Locking System, Substantial Interference
- Landlord
- Sterling Karamar Property Management
- Tenant
- M.D.
- Landlord rep
- Ben Charlebois
What happened
Tenant filed a T2 application alleging that the landlord changed the lock on the rental unit door to an electronic smart lock without providing the tenant with a replacement key, and that the smart lock substantially interfered with the tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit.
The ruling
The Tenant's application is dismissed. The Landlord did not alter the locking system without providing the Tenant with a replacement key, as the access code provided serves the same purpose as a traditional key. The Tenant also failed to establish that the smart lock substantially interfered with the Tenant's reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit.