Danam Limited v Balogh

Tenant wins · Scarborough · 2025-11-20

Adjudicator

Renée Lang

Dispute

Non-payment of Rent, Review Of Order

Amount

<$5K

Landlord

Danam Limited

Tenant

E.B., E.B., R.B.

What happened

The Landlord requested a review of a previous consent order, claiming a serious error occurred because an outstanding balance from an Above Guideline Increase (AGI) was omitted from the calculation of arrears. The Landlord alleged that the Dispute Resolution Officer failed to consider a ledger uploaded after the hearing. The Board found that since the Landlord's agent explicitly agreed to the amount of $1,346.64 during the hearing, the Board did not commit a serious error by relying on that agreement.

The ruling

The Landlord's request for a review of the order dated October 2, 2025, is denied. The original order, which established the amount owing as $1,346.64, remains confirmed and unchanged despite the Landlord's claim that an additional $1,082.29 was owed due to an Above Guideline Increase.