Borchetta v Pearson
Split/Other wins · Mount Hope · 2025-09-23
- Adjudicator
- Candace Aboussafy
- Dispute
- Damage to Property, Maintenance, Non-payment of Rent, Persistent Late Payment, Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Non-payment of rent (N4)
- Amount
- <$5K
- Landlord
- M.B.
- Tenant
- J.P., T.M.
- Landlord rep
- Francisco Gomez
- Tenant rep
- Kimberley Farrell
What happened
The Landlord applied for eviction based on non-payment of rent, damages to the roof, substantial interference, and persistent late payment. The Tenants requested a review of a previous order and raised significant maintenance issues under Section 82, including a leaking roof that eventually led to a ceiling collapse. The Tenants vacated the unit on April 30, 2024.
The ruling
The tenancy was terminated effective the move-out date of April 30, 2024. The Landlord's application for damages was dismissed. The Tenants were ordered to pay $4,575.47 in arrears, which was significantly reduced from the original claim due to a 25% rent abatement ($6,466.68) granted to the Tenants for the Landlord's failure to repair a leaking roof and collapsed ceiling.