Boileau v Hurtubise
Tenant wins · Bourget · 2025-05-07
- Adjudicator
- Paula West Oreskovich
- Dispute
- Damage to Property, Personal Use, Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Landlord
- G.B.
- Tenant
- C.H.
What happened
The Landlord filed an application to evict the Tenant for personal use (N12 notice), and for compensation for unpaid utilities, substantial interference, and misrepresentation of income. The Tenant moved out on October 15, 2024, after receiving the N12, making the eviction part of the application moot. The Board dismissed the Landlord's claims for utility costs, substantial interference, and income misrepresentation due to lack of evidence and relevance.
The ruling
The Landlord's application was dismissed. The request for eviction was moot as the Tenant had already moved out. The claim for $151.20 in utility costs was dismissed due to a lack of evidence of any agreement, verbal or written, for the Tenant to pay utilities. The Landlord's other claims regarding substantial interference and misrepresentation of income were also dismissed.