Park Side Motel Inc v Mcdonald

Landlord wins · Peterborough · 2021-10-13

Dispute

Non-payment of Rent, Substantial Interference

Landlord

Park Side Motel Inc

Tenant

T.M., A.T.M.

Landlord rep

Y Artzy, R. Marzel, C. Nastas

Tenant rep

D. Saunders

What happened

The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to non-payment of rent and substantial interference. The Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household and withheld or deliberately interfered with the reasonable supply of a vital service, care service, or food that the Landlord is obligated to supply under the tenancy agreement.

The ruling

The Landlord's applications and the Tenant's application are dismissed as the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 does not apply to the accommodations, which are a motel, and there was no valid tenancy agreement between the Landlord and Tenant.