McKenna v Hastie
Tenant wins · Carleton Place · 2021-04-13
- Adjudicator
- Donald MacVicar
- Dispute
- Personal Use
- Notice
- Personal use (N12)
- Landlord
- S.M.
- Tenant
- D.H., R.H.
- Landlord rep
- Tessa Morris
- Tenant rep
- Ralph Lee
What happened
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants because the Landlord requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the termination date.
The ruling
The Landlord's application is dismissed due to non-compliance with section 55.1 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. The Landlord failed to compensate the Tenants by the termination date specified in the N12 notice. The Tenants are ordered to pay the Landlord $250 for costs thrown away in relation to an adjournment.