Karakolov v Desousa
Landlord wins · Scarborough · 2021-11-24
- Adjudicator
- Alex Brkic
- Dispute
- Non-payment of Rent, Persistent Late Payment, Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Non-payment of rent (N4), Substantial Interference (N5), Persistent Late Payment (N8)
- Amount
- >$20K
- Landlord
- V.K.
- Tenant
- J.D., L.B.
- Landlord rep
- Desislava Yordanova
What happened
Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to non-payment of rent, substantial interference, and persistent late payment of rent. The Tenants had vacated the rental unit prior to the hearing.
The ruling
The tenancy was terminated effective May 31, 2021, the date the Tenants vacated the rental unit. The Tenants are ordered to pay $22,349.39 to the Landlord, which includes rent arrears, compensation, and the cost of filing the application, less the rent deposit and interest on the deposit. The Board lacked the authority to order the Tenants to pay the unpaid utility charges.