Hendricks v Mylavarapu

Landlord wins · Toronto · 2022-01-07

Adjudicator

Rebecca Case

Dispute

Interference with Reasonable Enjoyment, Harassment, Interference with Vital Services

Landlord

S.M.

Tenant

B.H.

Landlord rep

Natasha Mizzi

What happened

Tenant applied for an order determining that the Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant; altered the locking system without providing replacement keys; substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit; and withheld or interfered with the supply of vital services.

The ruling

The Board determined in the previous Eviction Order that the tenancy between the Tenant and Landlord was terminated effective June 14, 2019. The Tenant's current application is an improper collateral attack on the Eviction Order and is likely barred by the doctrine of issue estoppel. The Tenant's application is dismissed.