Ceresne v Luloo Rental Corp
Landlord wins · Toronto · 2021-11-02
- Adjudicator
- Alex Brkic
- Dispute
- Alteration Of Locks, Coercion, Harassment, Interference, Obstruction, Threat
- Landlord
- Luloo Rental Corp, P.R.
- Tenant
- D.C.
- Landlord rep
- Bryan Rubin
- Tenant rep
- Marshall Yarmus
What happened
Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlords harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant, altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or residential complex without giving the Tenant replacement keys and substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of the Tenant's household.
The ruling
The Board found that the rental unit is exempt from the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 under subsection 5(a) as it is intended to be provided to the travelling or vacationing public or occupied for a seasonal or temporary period. Therefore, the Board does not have jurisdiction to hear the Tenant's T2 application, which is dismissed. The interim order issued on September 1, 2021 is also cancelled.