Amarest Investments Inc v Anderson
Split/Other wins · Burlington · 2011-07-20
- Adjudicator
- Elizabeth Beckett
- Dispute
- Maintenance, Non-payment of Rent, Substantial Interference
- Notice
- Non-payment of rent (N4), Tenant rights (T2)
- Landlord
- Amarest Investments Inc
- Tenant
- S.A., N.A.
What happened
Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment of the Landlord or another tenant, as well as for non-payment of rent. The Tenants also filed applications regarding maintenance issues and tenant rights.
The ruling
The Landlord's L2 application is dismissed. The Landlord shall communicate with the tenants and assign each tenant a designated parking spot. The Landlord shall pay the Tenants $50 for the disruption caused by the parking situation and $100 for the lack of repair to the bedroom ceiling. The Landlord shall install a new light fixture in the kitchen and paint the repaired bedroom ceiling.